{ Create an Account }   { Login }   { Contact }

Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Is There a Prime Rate Cut in Our Future?

Wednesday, February 6th, 2013

“Recently the Bank of Canada (BoC) met and, as expected, left its target overnight rate unchanged.  More surprisingly though, the bank also eliminated its oft-repeated warning about near-term rate increases. Here is the exact wording from the announcement:

While some modest withdrawal of monetary policy stimulus will likely be required over time, consistent with achieving a two per cent inflation target, the more muted inflation outlook and the beginnings of a more constructive evolution of the imbalances in the housing sector suggest that the timing of any such withdrawal is less imminent than previously anticipated.”

-David Larock

Remonline.com

Unsold Condos in Toronto Steadily Rising, But Market Strong

Wednesday, February 6th, 2013

The percentage of unsold condominiums in Toronto™s housing market continues to rise but the market remains strong by historical standards, according to a new survey.

Urbanation Inc., one of the leading research companies in the condo industry, said overall the Toronto census metropolitan area was 79% sold in the fourth quarter of 2012, down from 80% a quarter earlier and 82% a year earlier. It is above the 10-year average of 78%.

Despite concerns over the level of unsold supply in the new condominium market, the ratio of sold to unsold units has consistently been above the long-run average in recent years, said Ben Myers, executive vice president of Urbanation, in a release. There remains confusion over unsold supply and standing inventory, to clarify, at the end of Q4-2012 there were just 613 completed and unsold new condominium apartment suites in the Toronto CMA ” some would be rented out by the developer, some used for construction offices, and others used as model suites for subsequent phases, effectively lowering this standing inventory figure even farther.

-Garry Marr, Financial Post

@DustyWallet

 

Real Estate Cheatsheet

Friday, January 25th, 2013

Torontolife’s Frances Mcinnis  has something interesting to say about the ups and downs of the modern real estate market.

“In the first half of 2012, Toronto home buyers faced rapidly escalating prices, bidding wars and “phantom bids.” In the second half of the year, the market cooled, in part due to the stricter mortgage rules that Finance Minister Jim Flaherty imposed in June. What did 2012 as a whole mean for current and aspiring homeowners? Below, we look at the end of year resale stats from the Toronto Real Estate Board, and break down the important numbers.

  • More Torontonians stayed put: The total number of sales in 2012 was 85,731, which, although reasonably high from a historic perspective, was still 3.8 per cent less than 2011’s 89,096 transactions. The first half of 2012 was much more active than the year before, but couldn’t make up for the significant slowing in the second half.
  • Prices were still up: The average selling price for 2012 was $497,298, almost seven per cent higher than in 2011. That said, average prices can bemisleading since they can be skewed by one segment of the market; for instance, when there’s a decline in the volume of sales for lower-priced homes.
  • Low-rise homes continued to dominate: The prices of low-rise homes—a category that includes semis, townhouses and, of course, highly-coveted detached homes—saw the strongest growth.
  • The condo market is getting dicier: As for the condo market, the slow-down that started earlier in the year got worse in December with a sales volume drop of almost 27 per cent. The average price of a condo in Toronto proper fell 1.8 per cent.”

-Frances McInnis, TorontoLife

Landlords wake up and smell the green

Tuesday, July 31st, 2012

The rush is on to leave a smaller footprint – and they’re not talking about a building’s lot size.

July 17, 2007

Canada’s commercial real estate industry, like many other business sectors, is embracing change to make sure its environmental footprint is more eco-friendly.

The industry is now in the thick of efforts to broaden its “green” efforts beyond merely decreasing energy consumption in the vast stock of office buildings across the country.

It’s a key issue because buildings are one of the biggest contributor to the greenhouses gases that are considered responsible for climate change on the planet.

“When people think of global warming, many of them probably think of factory smokestacks and cars,” said Nancy Searchfield, a green buildings expert at Colliers International in Toronto and a board member on the

Canada Green Building Council. “People don’t realize that buildings contribute 30 per cent of greenhouse gases.”

Making sure newly constructed building are “green” is a important objective, she said, but there can be much more of an impact through improving the performance of the billions of square feet of existing commercial space across the country. The greening of buildings has become such a hot issue that large real estate firms are bending over backwards to make sure people know they are concerned about the planet. CB Richard Ellis Group Inc., the huge real estate service firm based in Los Angeles, said recently it will attempt to become “carbon neutral” by 2010. To do that it will cut energy use in it offices, make better use of space, and buy offset credits if necessary.

Perhaps more important than the internal goals, CBRE has set up a task force to help its clients become more energy efficient in the 1.7 billion square feet of office space they occupy around the world.  Stefan Ciotlos, executive vice-president of CBRE (Canada) and the Canadian representative on the task force, said the move is “a recognition that the company has a global responsibility, and can be a global influence.”

The idea is to share best practices around the world, he said, and Canada should be able to make a significant contribution because we have a different climate and geography than most other countries.

Many Canadian building owners and managers have made changes, or are considering changes, to ensure their buildings’ operations are more environmentally friendly.

Cheryl Gray, senior vice-president for national real estate services at property manager Bentall Capital LP, says managing energy costs has been a key focus for decades, but with concerns over environmental issues now top of mind, “it has taken on a much more sophisticated context.” Some building owners and tenant are taking a more “holistic” approach to environmental issues, and are not just looking at immediate financial payback, she added.

Environmentally positive changes can include massive retrofits, such as shifting a building’s cooling from an inefficient system to Enwave deep lake water cooling that’s now available in downtown Toronto, Ms. Gray said. But they can also involve much smaller moves, such as improving recycling in tenants’ offices by keeping cellphones and batteries out of the garbage stream, or installing motion sensors so that rooms aren’t lit when not in use.

Some building owners are installing green roofs, planting drought resistant plants for landscaping, or capturing rain water for irrigation. Building managers and owners can also set standards for tenants, encouraging them to use more recycled materials in constructing offices.

“There are lots of opportunities. The list is endless if you really start looking at the different components of a an existing property,” Ms. Gray said.

Colliers’ Ms. Searchfield said many environmentally positive changes are really “low-hanging fruit” that don’t require much of an investment to put in place. Any building manager can shift to “green housekeeping,” for example, using biodegradable cleaning products instead of more toxic materials. And lowering lighting levels is not usually a major retrofit.

One of the side benefits of retrofitting space so it’s more green: Owners may have an easier time attracting tenants, and those tenants will be better able to attract staff, who now sometimes take environmental issues into account when deciding who they want to work for.

Buildings that have made significant environmental progress can now get recognition from Canada’s Building Owners and Managers Association, which has created the “Go Green” program to certify properties that meet 10 environmental best practices.

BOMA’s Go Green Plus is more rigorous, and sets measured benchmarks for energy consumption, water usage, emissions, waste reduction etc. About 66 buildings in Canada have reached that level.

YOU DO THE MATH: A CASE STUDY IN GREEN RETROFITTING

The poster child for environmentally retrofitted older buildings is a cluster of three mid-sized office towers in San Jose, Calif., owned by software maker Adobe Systems Inc.

The connected towers house about one million square feet of space, and were built between 1996 and 2003. The retrofit was completed last year.

Adobe has achieved enormous energy savings through a wide range of programs, some almost unbelievably simple, said Pierre Bergevin, president of Cushman & Wakefield Facilities Management in Toronto. His firm’s U.S. arm worked with Adobe and the U.S. Green Building Council to make the changes.

Adobe spent $1.4-million (U.S.) on the project. But it got $389,000 in rebates from governments and its electrical supplier, and saved almost $1.2-million in operating costs in the first year – meaning full payback came in less than 12 months.

Among the changes: 45 energy management projects, including systems that shut power off automatically when not needed, and lower-energy lighting, saved almost $900,000 a year.

Parking garage fans were reprogrammed so they didn’t run all the time, but only when needed. The cost was less than $200; the annual savings about $67,000.

Drought resistant plants replaced non-native species, reducing landscape irrigation costs by about 76 per cent.

Automatic faucets and waterless urinals were installed in bathrooms, helping to reduce overall water use by 22 per cent.

Lighting systems for exit signs were changed to LEDs

Recycling and composting diverted more than 85 per cent of waste, contributing to waste management savings of about $137,000 a year.

Richard Blackwell

The data included on this website is deemed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed to be accurate by the Toronto Real Estate Board. The trademarks REALTOR®, REALTORS® and the REALTOR® logo are controlled by The Canadian Real Estate Association (CREA) and identify real estate professionals who are members of CREA. Used under license.